@baba I posted this psychic vision in the Impeachment section last night before seeing your post and now have moved my post to this thread.
Over the last five days, while not reading the news, I keep seeing Trump and the words money laundering in my mind's eye. I've known (with my psychic eye) for a long while now that money laundering is the Trump family's true business. Ivanka was involved with a Panama hotel that was a key money laundering site. Her jewelry line had also become a medium for money laundering. Of course she was never directly implicated, and her knowledge and guilt were never established.
And now my third sees Trump money laundering is coming out big time. These stories are rising in my third eye this week. And it is not because these stories are news to me. It is likely because something is going to happen that's already set in motion that will bring this issue to the forefront very soon. For me it's like when you know snow is coming because of something you smell in the air.
To @Codyroo's post about the Saudi Prince hacking Jeff Bezos' phone which came out in the news this week--That news brought up an other vision rising in my third eye. I've felt since the first time I heard that Kushner had become good buddies with the Saudi Prince in 2017 that Trump via his son in law coordinates with the Saudi Prince in the same way that Trump coordinates with the Kremlin.
I get these visions intuitively and then begin noticing supporting news stories: Bezos owns the Washington Post and that newspaper has been more unrelenting than any other main stream newspaper about documenting Trump's criminal behavior and embarrassing him. So torturing and killing Jamal Kashoggi served two purposes for the Saudi Prince. First he sent a message to Saudi journalists who dared to criticize him. And second, the killing hurt the WAPO staff and owner, Jeff Bezos, who employed Kashoggi.
Why else would the Saudi Prince go to so much effort to hurt Bezos? Why also would he become such great friends with Jared Kushner such that the two buddies stayed up all night together chumming? I knew when I first read about int that Kushner was trying to get money from him to pay for his foolish purchase of 666 Park Avenue right before the 2008 market crash. But now I see a perfect symbiotic relationship between the two.
It's all going to come out now. I keep looking at it in my mind's eye and see that the public will feel such a shock at the stark difference between what is true about Trump and his family and what so many people do not yet know. The fact that the word "money laundering" is looming in my inner eye this week, and also Trump's connection with the Saudi Prince, tell me something is about to happen.
@journeywithme2 I had posted a photo of the White House reflected on a construction vehicle because I thought it fit a vision I'd had. Is this it? I had posted the photo on November 23 about a Nov 19 story, which was a huge week for things falling apart for the WH. That week was an Impeachment turning point.
That picture makes it look like the White House is about to go over the Falls!
This is SO strange. A couple of nights ago, I was in my room trying to meditate, which is hard for me, because I'm really bad at it. I closed my eyes, and I was trying to send light to all of our Democratic fighters, but all I kept seeing was Moscow Mitch and Twitler going over-you guessed it-Niagara Falls. It was like a cartoon movie clip. Stuff was flying off them-pens, pencils, phones, glasses, and their arms and legs were flailing like Wile E. when he went over a cliff. lol Weird.
I saw something yesterday, and I don't know if it was a sign or just me being overly-optomisitc. But we will see.
I was driving up to my office and happened to listen to a radio segment where a Trump supporter was openly disparaging Democrats over impeachment. As always, I felt mentally sick and turned it off, mentally asking God if this madness would ever end, as I was discouraged.
At that point, I saw the daffodils planted in front of my office building. And one was in full bloom.
Now, I know I mentioned in an earlier post about the fact that the daffodils were already coming up from the ground at the end of December, when previous years have seen them come up no earlier than late January, and blooming no sooner than late February. Obviously, this is partly related to the global warming that is occurring everywhere.
But I think this daffodil means something else. Because for the last five days, we have had colder than normal temperatures (in Fahrenheit-no warmer than 35 degrees and the lows have dropped down to as low as 12 degrees.) Many of the daffodils and other flowering plants that were coming up have already died due to the cold and from coming up too early.
And yet somehow, this little daffodil, which shouldn't be alive after five straight days of freezing temperatures, is not only alive, but in full bloom, even as frost was clinging to its stem. I checked it again this morning, and it is still alive and apparently ignoring the cold temperatures, which are now thankfully leaving the area as we return to the forties and lower fifties this weekend.
Maybe I am looking too much into this, but I felt a sense of calm when I saw that flower. It was almost as if I was getting a sign that, despite all the adversity we were seeing, the side of life and light would prevail. Or maybe a daffodil just makes me happy and I am looking too much into a coincidence. I guess time will tell. But I thought I'd share.
Three times in the last 24-hours I've heard the words: "tax evasion, wire fraud, money laundering." (It's starting to feel like a refrain.)
Just got it again and had to post it. I have to think it's significant to the subject of this thread. Anyone else?
@Jeanne-Mayell, Yes! Yes, yes, yes.
Don't ask me how I found it, but half-past-midnight on 9/2/19 I posted the above in this thread (page 43, I think).
In the weeks leading up to 1/21/20, I kept feeling like a golden anvil "reveal"—a hammer of truth, if you will—would be falling out of the sky on that date, which I mentioned here this week. Two minutes before midnight on the 21st, another trove of Ukraine documents were released. But earlier in the evening, I followed a whim and entered a Google search for "T---p + Deutsche Bank."
A few hours earlier, four independent journalists had posted a story based on financial evidence which links T's loans to Russian money, mediated by (read: funneled through) Deutsche Bank. There's even a direct link to P himself.
Unless you're a financial expert (or, generally speaking, a Capricorn), the text is a little on the dry side. I'm neither, not by a mile, but I'd wager this story is a mother of a golden sky hammer.
I have a feeling that a more mainstream source will be covering this soon (if they haven't already; I've been engrossed in work and haven't checked). If you want to rip the hem out of T's secret money laundering enterprise, this seems like the thread to yank.
Humpty Trumpty sat on a "wall,"
Humpty Trumpty had a great fall;
and all the king's horses and all the king's men
couldn't hide all the criminal evidence.
I've also been noticing miracles in nature these past few weeks that signal perseverance and rebirth. You're not looking too much into a coincidence. That daffodil is a message from spirit.
Lordy, there are tapes! It looks like Igor Fruman made a tape at an event in which Trump talked about wanting to fire the ambassador to Ukraine. This contradicts what the president was telling everyone as far as knowing Parnas and Fruman.
@Baba, still hearing "Blow the Man Down" in my head.
Some important notes about the Fruman tape today - bear with me, it's a little long:
The date of the tape is April 31, 2018.
At first, that seems to dispute the idea that his rant about wanting Yovanovitch "taken out" had any significance since it was well before the Biden call in 2019.
So, I did a little digging in the NY Times archives to remind myself about what was going on at that time.
In April 2018, Mueller's team was actively preparing for Manafort's trial, which of course, directly linked to Ukraine.
And then I found this NY Times article (link below) dated May 2, 2018. It seems that the Ukrainian government had suddenly decided to stop cooperating with Mueller out of fear that Trump would cut off their U.S. military aid for 2018.
Quote from the article which again came out two days after Trump said he wanted Yovanovitch "taken out":
Ukraine, Seeking U.S. Missiles, Halted Cooperation With Mueller Investigation
...in Ukraine, where officials are wary of offending President Trump, four meandering cases that involve Mr. Manafort, Mr. Trump’s former campaign chairman, have been effectively frozen by Ukraine’s chief prosecutor.
The cases are just too sensitive for a government deeply reliant on United States financial and military aid, and keenly aware of Mr. Trump’s distaste for the investigation by the special counsel, Robert S. Mueller III, into possible collusion between Russia and his campaign, some lawmakers say.
The decision to halt the investigations by an anticorruption prosecutor was handed down at a delicate moment for Ukraine, as the Trump administration was finalizing plans to sell the country sophisticated anti-tank missiles, called Javelins.
Take a moment to read the article if you can.
It seems likely to me that Yovanovitch was probably encouraging Ukraine to keep helping Mueller's team; after all, she's a law and order type and knew it was official U.S. policy to support Mueller's investigation.
So, it is also likely that:
(1) Trump used the threat of with holding military aid in both 2018 and 2019.
(2) He got what he wanted in 2018 -- Ukraine stopped cooperating with Mueller. But if Yovanovitch was still encouraging Ukraine to help Manafort, of course he'd see her as a threat and want her "removed."
(3) However, he couldn't just fire her because then questions might be asked about the timing. Or she might blow the whistle. So, instead, he turned to Lev and Igor to "take her out."
(4) This also suggests obstruction with the Mueller investigation. He used the powers of his office to get the message to Ukraine that if they cooperated with Mueller, he'd cut off the military aid for 2018. Someone made it clear to Ukraine (would be interesting to look at Rudy, Lev and Igor's movements during this time).
In any case, in 2018, Ukraine got the the message and did what he wanted. (Again read the May 2018 article above). Only problem was that pesky Ambassador encouraging Ukraine to keep cooperating with Mueller.
(5) If Ukraine did his bidding in 2018 (and they did - read the article), he figured why not use the same technique again in 2019 with another "favor" for dirt on Biden?
This time, however, his scheme didn't work as well as there was a new administration and president in Ukraine.
(6) If my hunch is right, 2019 wasn't the first quid pro quo scheme Trump had run with Ukraine. It's a clear pattern of obstruction (of Mueller, of Congress), abuse of power (2 years in a row), and putting your personal gain ahead of that of American citizens (Yovanovitch, Bidens, etc.).
I suspect that the Schiff and all have already figured all of this out but don't have concrete proof for the 2018 obstruction. Mueller himself probably tried to get that but was stopped before he could go any farther. But, this is why Yovanovitch is SO critical to everything.
Any how, @baba, I know that you saw a big revelation involving Rudy and Parnas coming out for "Friday" and thought it was for the 31st, but this seems pretty major to me once I connected the dots.
If my hunch is right, 2019 wasn't the first quid pro quo scheme Trump had run with Ukraine.
@rosieheart, Thanks for sparking my memory! And thanks for the NY Times piece. I heard about this on one of Rachel Maddow’s shows. David Ignatius of the Post also did a piece on it. A lot of this centers around the black ledger that Ukraine was investigating – a secret, handwritten list of $2 billion in shady payments by the political party of ousted Ukranian President Yanukovich. When reports of the ledger first appeared, the scandal led to the resignation of Manafort as T’s campaign manager. Manafort’s name was found in the ledger, next to sums of hundreds of thousands of dollars. So Ghouliani makes a trip to Ukraine, a few days later the black ledger (i.e. Manafort) investigation is moved and halted, Ukraine stops cooperating with Mueller, Ukraine President Poroshenko gets his meeting with T. at the WH, and Ukraine eventually receives their javelin missiles.
Here are the Maddow and Ignatius links:
I, too, get a strong sense something big is coming. Something Financial is what comes to me.
@RosieHeart well done and I have no doubt that you are right that there have been several quid pro quo incidents between Ukraine and Trump. I have been following Seth Abramson’s twitter feed and have read both of his books. He posits, based on media reporting, the the Qataris also have proof of wrong doing that they wouldn’t turn over to Mueller’s team. This was around the time that Kushner wanted a loan from them for his NYC building that threatened to bankrupt his family and around the same time that they suddenly were blockaded by the Emirates and Saudis. They did eventually give in due to the pressure. Additionally, there is speculation that Trump profited or attempted to profit on the sale of Rosneft shares through an intermediary by promising to lift sanctions on the Russians if elected - not to mention all the assistance from Russia, Saudi Arabia, Israel...
He, his family and some of his administration have been very busy grifting all over the world. I can only hope that this is all brought to light soon so that it is stopped. Then we can all sing a rousing chorus of Blow the Man Down together!
There are moments when I feel to remain silent regarding a Trump action is liken to being complicit with his crime.
And so I wrote this on my social media account today.
As a mother of a child who suffered a traumatic brain injury, I find I must speak out and support our 34 US troops who have suffered with concussions and traumatic brain injury following the Iranian missile attack.
Mr. President , it is inexcusable to state our service members are simply suffering from "headaches".
I don't like conflict.
Being passive is ok until it isn't. Being passive about this issue would negate everything my daughter went through to overcome and recover from the challenges she faced after her life altering concussion at the age of 15. Those service members have worried parents and I hold those parents and their brave children in my heart.
I so feel you on this!!! My son had TBI from an automobile wreck at 17 years old...it totally changed our lives and his future. He is now 32 and is just now "coming out of the dark" to a "normal life". To hear IMPOTUS so dismissively describe it as "just a headache - nothing serious - not like losing arms or legs etc" was horrifying to me. To so callously disregard any form of sensitivity or regret of the injuries HE caused with his ill advised actions solely for the purpose of distraction from the Impeachment proceedings. SMH ... I have no words to describe how sick and despairing it made me feel. I pray with all my heart that America's eyes be opened to the harm this POS and his minions are raining down on us...and that we the people prevail before the harm can not be reversed. As I was driving home from the clinic after work I was praying for a sign and asking for Peace and Support. When I pulled in my yard... I saw several of my daffodils .. have bloomed.. about 4 weeks early. I gave thanks and I give thanks for this forum and safe place/haven to come and renew and be encouraged.
Bolton book release moved up to March 17th. Very near the Ides of March, which many of us have predicted. T's defense destroyed.
BREAKING: Bolton is reportedly furious about the leak of stunning details from his manuscript. An apparent change of plans has occurred.
Bolton’s book, "The Room Where it Happened," is set for release on March 17. The Amazon page has now gone live.
I can't believe the nerve of Bolton. Furious that there was a leak -- likely from someone who wants the truth to come out -- but unwilling to just tell the truth unless he's paid for it. He doesn't need a subpoena to release information that'll already been OK'd to out in a book. If the republicans won't agree to witnesses in the trial, then go to a mic and tell your story. Or send the house dems a sworn statement. Sheesh, it's all money with these people. They're like zombies, animated but without a soul.
You're predictions have been spot-on Lawrence. I hope March is sh#t show for T.
@lynnventura
Read it was leaked by the National Security Council.
Yes, what nerve. Bolton is like the rest of them. Greed and power is the only thing they care about.
Heather Cox Richardson noted in her summary that Bolton has a first hand account witness to it all and that the White House has sat on the manuscript preventing it out and Bolton from testifying. She posits that is the reason Moscow Mitch wanted to hurry up and speed through the trial. She also noted that the current administration's "dismantling of the government means we have not had anyone in charge of leading the U.S. response to a pandemic since May 2018, when Rear Admiral Timothy Ziemer from the National Security Council was pushed out during a shake up by then National Security Advisor John Bolton, who broke up the team designed to focus on global health security."
The plot thickens as the gaslighting tweets whip the emotions of the citizens to a frenzy as polls now show 50% of Americans think the Senate should vote to convict and remove him from office.
May you live in interesting times indeed!!!!
the droplets have become a trickle...and now the dam is breached and a flood of information is imminent...let us keep praying and sending Light to all who need it.