Notifications
Clear all

Predictions done August 20, 2018  

Page 2 / 2
  RSS

(@jeanne-mayell)
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3351
09/05/2018 11:11 pm  

Oh, Thanks, KB.  There's quite a hunt out now to identify whoever it is. I hope the person will be protected. But forensic linguists will be able to figure it out unless it's been heavily edited. 


ReplyQuote
(@fran)
Registered
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 110
09/05/2018 11:25 pm  

I believe before he departed, Zoron had said there was a cabal on the inside working against Trump. 

I have repeatedly stated I feel things speeding up. It’s like vibrations in the ether and the rumble is growing. 


ReplyQuote
(@jeanne-mayell)
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3351
09/06/2018 1:39 pm  

Hi Frannie,  I also feel things are speeding up. It's a little unnerving but it's physics - we are heading towards the center of a spiral and will soon go down the rabbit hole. Fortunately something good is coming up the rabbit hole. 

About the cabal prediction -- I looked through all instances of the word "cabal" in the forum and Zoron did not mention anything about a cabal of people on the inside working against Trump.  Zoron used the term "cabal" to refer to secret groups Trump was forming or were part of Trump's efforts, but not about groups that were formed against him. 

A number of people (myself, Zoron, Meghan, Bluebelle, Natalie, and others who contributed to the timeline readings) have predicted Trump's downfall where a net would be closing in and the rats would jump ship when that happened.  At one point early on in his tenure, I had given him two years and then I thought he'd recede  into the background but I didn't think he'd be impeached.  At other times, I thought it would happen sooner, as did others,  but it has not happened.  Zoron did not give a time frame on Trump's tenure, as far as I know.  


Matt, KB, BlueBelle and 1 people liked
ReplyQuote
(@jeanne-mayell)
Admin
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 3351
09/17/2018 1:28 pm  

I just noticed that one of our long-time readers sent this email to me on August 17: 

 

From: David [last name redacted]
Date: August 17, 2018 at 3:22:09 PM PDT
Subject: Judge Kavanaugh.....
Judge Kavanaugh will not become a Supreme Court Justice.  He will withdraw his name from consideration after certain revelations are made regarding his previous writings and work!

Matt, Marley, KB and 1 people liked
ReplyQuote
(@vestralux)
Registered
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 479
09/18/2018 12:00 am  
Posted by: Baba

I feel it might be some kind of incident or behavior that Trump (or his minions) has tried to hide that will become public - either through legal proceedings  or someone gets angry and decides to expose him. In a way it will be the kind of thing that he did/had done to others during the last election being done to him. Perhaps some kind of poetic justice. 

I've seen a few things culminating which may be related to this.

The first is connected to Roger Stone and the Manhattan Madam. (Aside: my earliest vision related to this occurred two years ago; the second showed up last winter.) I see a series of revelations being forced to the surface—like stalwart roots pushing through concrete—connecting high-flying, powerful New York targets (I see Giuliani's face in the mix) to sex-related crimes, which the public will find morally repugnant. Trump's worst demons will be exposed. 

Further details about coerced abortions, "illegitimate" children, and more will be revealed and corroborated. (Perhaps David Pecker's vault will be opened.)

I see someone, potentially Ronan Farrow, working diligently on a long-form investigation into this matter and related claims. There has been or will be difficulty before it finds publication, but its claims will eventually be validated in the NY courts. There may be an important female prosecutor or judge involved.

(Not unrelated: I continually see the Three of Cups in Trump readings—women in celebration—and I see the streets filling with jubilant women after midterms. Though, it doesn't take a psychic...) 

I've also had a hit this past week that a woman in Don Jr.'s past (I think it's Vanessa) saw/ knew/experienced "too much," and may have been treated badly by him at times. I didn't see him being violent, but I felt her sharing her fear and pain with someone close to her about mistreatment. She's faced intense suppression, but I see her experiences eventually coming to light.

As I was writing about the Madam above, I flashed on a potent image of Don Jr.'s face, an indication to me that he may have been inducted into his father's world early, and later happily hunted within it. [My first emotion at seeing this was revulsion (it felt sinister), but looking deeper, I'm concerned by what could have been the implicit sexualization of the adolescent child by the narcissistic father—a pathological strain that reveals itself also, though differently, in Trump's fetishization of Ivanka.]


RosieHeart, Matt, Laura F. and 2 people liked
ReplyQuote
(@rosieheart)
Registered
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 275
09/30/2018 8:48 pm  
Posted by: Jeanne Mayell

Reading done on August 20, 2018

  •  
  • For November I see a map of the U.S. with California dominant. The events in California will be felt in this country.  I see so much fire and red and a lot of intensity and resolve. Californians will make a big stand. They have had enough.  (Jeanne Mayell)

 

It's not November yet, but news is breaking tonight that the U.S. Department of Justice plans to sue the state of California tomorrow over California's new "net neutrality" law:

The Trump administration said Sunday it will sue California in an effort to block what some experts have described as the toughest net neutrality law ever enacted in the United States, setting up a high-stakes legal showdown over the future of the Internet.

Mere hours after California’s proposal became law, senior Justice Department officials told The Washington Post they would take the state to court on grounds that the federal government, not state leaders, has the exclusive power to regulate net neutrality. 

With other states considering net neutrality laws of their own, the DOJ "may want to try to take [California] to the Supreme Court if it goes that far,” said Carl Tobias, a law professor at the University of Richmond.

The coming legal clash may fuel partisan tensions just weeks before voters cast ballots in a deeply contested midterm election. 

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/10/01/trump-administration-is-suing-california-quash-its-new-net-neutrality-law/?utm_term=.ed68ebf125f9

The article goes on to note that more than 20 states have filed lawsuits against the Federal Government, arguing that the agency had acted arbitrarily in repealing the net neutrality rules established during the Obama administration.  

 


TaG22, Marley, VestraLux and 2 people liked
ReplyQuote
(@tag22)
Registered
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 110
10/09/2018 4:16 pm  

I had a dream a couple nights ago that we were going to see the Statue of Liberty except that Lady Liberty was now in San Francisco.  Maybe this has to do with the stand CA is taking against this administration.


ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 2
Share: